Students should adhere to the following exam policies. Specific information about each exam will be provided on the exam schedule and on exam day. Some instructions for specific exams may be emailed to students.
Instructors should never be contacted regarding any exam matter.
Written final examinations are graded on the basis of aninimity, only using a four digit number as the identity of the student. Instructors do not know what exam belongs to what student, nor can they answer questions about exam reschedules or exam administration (e.g. using a bluebook instead of ExamSoft). Professors should also never be contacted for any reason after the last class session (or review session).
- Students are expected to be available throughout the entire exam period.
- Collaboration with other persons on an exam (including take-home exams) is strictly prohibited (and is a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy) unless clearly authorized in the written examination instructions.
- Students are expected to follow the directives and requests of examination proctors, Records and Registration staff, and the Vice Dean for Student Affairs, or any other Law School employee involved in the administration of examinations, projects or papers before, during and after an exam. Failure to do so may be considered a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy.
- Unauthorized devices are not allowed in the exam rooms unless specifically allowed by the instructor. If a family emergency is pending, direct callers to the Records & Registration Office phone number (716-645-2060). Failure to do so will be considered a violation of the Academic Integrity Policy. Students are prohibited from bringing phones or backpacks into the exam room. If the exam is multiple choice only then laptops will not be allowed in the room. Please store these items in your lockers during the exam. It is suggested that you bring a watch if your laptop is not allowed in the room.
- Students must not write their name or otherwise indicate their identity or make personal comments about their performance anywhere on the examination (such as "I ran out of time"), and to do so violates the Academic Integrity Policy.
Students who experience illness or an emergency before or during an examination should contact Records and Registration or the Vice Dean for Student Affairs immediately.
A student who picks up an examination is expected to complete it during the scheduled examination period for that examination. A student who does not complete an examination will be graded on what he or she submits during the examination period.
Students with disabilities should submit a written request for examination modifications to the Vice Dean for Social Justice Initiatives, Melinda Saran, Room 614 O'Brian Hall, no later than three weeks prior to the start of the exam period. Students who have not identified themselves as a student with a disability should see Dean Saran as soon as possible, as they will need to provide appropriate documentation of their disability to qualify for modifications.
A. UB Statement of Principle on Academic Integrity
The University has a responsibility to promote academic honesty and integrity and to develop procedures to deal effectively with instances of academic dishonesty. Students are responsible for the honest completion and representation of their work, for the appropriate citation of sources, and for respect for others' academic endeavors. By placing their name on academic work, students certify the originality of all work not otherwise identified by appropriate acknowledgment.
B. General Policy
- Academic dishonesty is a serious breach of the atmosphere of mutual trust and confidence that is necessary for productive academic work. It also may cast serious doubt on the ability, character, and fitness to practice law of the individual who commits such acts. Students who have reason to believe that academic dishonesty has occurred are encouraged to report the facts promptly to the Law School Administration and/or to the course instructor. Instructors shall report to the Law School Administration any incident in which there is probable cause to believe academic dishonesty has occurred.
- The instructor has the obligation to make clear to students, preferably in writing, the rules and conditions under which course work will be evaluated. The student has the obligation to inform himself or herself about the rules applicable to grading or performance evaluation, and to seek clarification from the instructor or the Law School Administration in case of doubt. Basic, widely-shared premises and understandings about what constitutes dishonest conduct need not be provided in writing or orally.
- Absent written permission for cooperative or collaborative preparation of responses to any examination, take-home or in class, common understanding leaves no doubt that collaboration on all examinations is strictly prohibited. It will be treated as a serious breach of academic honesty and integrity.
- It is difficult and unnecessary to provide a definition for every act of academic dishonesty. The generic term covers a multitude of wrongful acts and derives content through usage, custom, and a commonly shared understanding of integrity and responsibility. All of these sources of standards are particularly important in the profession and practice of law.
- "Academic dishonesty" includes, but is not limited to:
- PLAGIARISM: the use of source materials in a writing assignment without sufficient citation or attribution;
- Submitting the same, or substantially the same, written work for academic credit in more than one course without the prior unequivocal written permission of BOTH instructors;
- Violation of rules established by the instructor, the Law School, or the University regarding the completion of student assignments or exercises which are to be used in evaluating academic performance;
- Unauthorized interference in or tampering with the process of assigning and recording grades, including intentional breaches of anonymity.
- Examples of plagiarism would include (a) submission of a seminar paper or brief containing extracts from law review articles or other published sources which are not identified as such by quotation marks, footnotes, or other standard indicators, and (b) appropriation and use of lines of argumentation or analysis which are taken from another source but are presented as the student's own (i.e., not attributed to the source, even if presented in the student's own words).
- Violations of rules relating to the completion of student assignments used in evaluating academic performance would include (a) use during an examination of notes or reference sources not permitted in advance by the instructor, (b) unauthorized collaboration with another student in preparing an examination answer or written course work, and (c) misrepresenting work done for academic credit, such as passing off work done by another person as one's own, or assisting another student in such passing off.
- Unauthorized interference in the grading process would include (a) theft of or tampering with copies of examination, bluebooks, answer sheets, grade report forms, permanent record cards, computer files, or other records used in the grading process, and (b) revealing one's identity on an anonymously graded examination.
Except for highly unusual extenuating circumstances, the minimum penalty for an act of academic dishonesty is the recording of a grade of "F" for the course in question and the placement of a letter in the violator's file setting forth the facts of the incident. If a different grade for the course has already been recorded, the grade may be changed to an administrative "F" without review by the full faculty. Subject to applicable laws, the letter in the violator's file or its content normally would be disclosed to a state bar committee inquiring into the character, fitness, or academic standing of the student seeking admission to the bar. The maximum penalty for an act of academic dishonesty is expulsion from the Law School.